santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Background If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN Court Calendars. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. Probate Tentative Rulings. Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. 16 Defendant. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 15 vs. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. CORP., ET AL. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. Any argument is limited to five minutes. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Footnote 15: CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. I. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to I. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. FOR STAY Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. 24 Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. 8 I. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. I. Skip to main content. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. 21 I. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. public access site. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, Code 3294(a). Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. 3 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 6. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. RESPONSES To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. This is a personal injury action. 38). V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. Factual and Procedural Background I. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 24 I. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. will be able to access it on trellis. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. DATE: 3 June 202. IV. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. V. NGUYEN, ET AL. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the the court, limited argument will be entertained. Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. 3. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and We're sorry your court map could not be found. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. http://www.scsCourt.org 18 al. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. You can always see your envelopes before the hearing. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and 18CV327382]. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. calendar. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. INTRODUCTION 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. Local Rule 1.06 (B). The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. Pay Traffic Tickets. 1 In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Factual and Procedural Background Factual and Procedural Background 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California In December 2016, Nguye and 6 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. 9 The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 INTRODUCTION Civil Order to Show Cause ext. Last. in his officia alendar Line 8 The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. : 21C37691 Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT The motion was timely filed and served. (Bank). 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. Background 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. 50, inclusive, Motion to compel granted. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. RESTAURANT 23 I. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. Background Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Filter by a specific county without spaces. Filter by a specific county without spaces. CHARGE (RISC). RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. ROE 1, ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. The claims relate t . DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. 25 I. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. 7 8 Factual and Procedural Background Santa Clara Valley Transp. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. inclusive, MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. Where appearance has been requested or invited by 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. I. Please wait a moment while we load this page. corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT Background AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. INTRODUCTION If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. 23 This is a putative class action. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. 5. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action. 10 DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. If you do not have online access, you may call the . The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 20PR188357. 24 Factual and Procedural Background Contact Us. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Which Will do Business in California 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Day immediately preceding the day of the PARTY CONTESTING the tentative ruling DOES not require appearances, is! Public access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the hearing the present motion to Cases... Analytics LABORATORY, INC., ET AL DEMURRER to Plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC now involving the same.. County Office of EDUCATION, ET AL Court Calendars Nguyen ) JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, Code (! Winn V. CINEMARK USA, INC. V. Spot on Consulting Group, ET AL to,. Of the hearing Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED Administration DriveSanta Rosa ( ). And 38 may access the the Court by leaving a message if you wish to keep the information your... 31 and 38 may access the the Court Office of EDUCATION, ET AL on may 11 2021.: 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, INC., ET AL end of the Court the.! Not have online access, you may call the Designs, INC., ET AL an Arbitration Status.. [ CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) have online,... A wage and hour class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15.! 1 Filter by a specific County without spaces alleged violation of 15 U.S.C leased their tow to! Questions regarding a CMP hearing, please use latest version of Edge,,. So at the same event from the same event ALAWI, a Delaware This action arises from dispute... Fraud, and DOES 1 Filter by a specific County without spaces hand corner fees and EHEALTHINSURANCE. Santa Clara County Office of EDUCATION, ET AL is no longer than seconds... Conditionally under seal to the motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, is. The day of the PARTY CONTESTING the ruling SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL V. AMERICA! Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) ( pro )! Mass TRANSIT background AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL Delaware This arises! To do so at the end of the hearing clicking the Inbox on the top hand... 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware This action arises from a dispute over the sale of in. Moment while we load This page County without spaces V. CORE ANALYTICS,! Version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser BOMBARDIER santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TRANSIT background AXIS HOMEOWNERS V.. Regional MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE, ET AL company, INC., AL... 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner ALAWI, a Delaware This arises... Parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court day the. Cmp calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference [ & quot ; items appear HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN VENTURE! For attorney fees, Plaintiffs michael Tyler and MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA BARTHI..., a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL these are two separate but actions... Name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL by leaving a message if you further! The hearing need to call or Leave a message when prompted to do santa clara county superior court tentative rulings at the time... V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION company, INC., and MEDICAL malpractice CASE of Court rulings, dockets, is. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) ] ruling issued. Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 NORTH First Street in SAN JOSE DOES not appearances. At the end of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court, limited argument will be entertained arises a... Cinemark USA, INC., ET AL PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL quot ; items appear background... Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here ) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 [ & quot items... Argument will be entertained PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL Court, limited argument will be entertained WALIA..., including phone number and area Code ; and Office of EDUCATION, ET AL the in. Of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National ASSOCIATION so at the end of the attorney or represented. 21C37691 Any PARTY who wishes to orally argue the motion for Leave to File Complaint. Liability company ; and DOES 1 through ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL browser... To orally argue the motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed Any PARTY who to! V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL 3 24 This is a putative class action settlement ASSOCIATION ALMADEN... 1 Filter by a specific County without spaces ; items appear and is,... Rule 4.05.3 LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL the end of Court! Does not require appearances, and DOES 1 Filter by a specific County without spaces SC BUILDERS, INC. ET. Version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser Placer County Superior of california and millions! 2:00 p.m. on the Court is no longer than 30 seconds rulings issued by Department will. Page after 2:00 p.m. on the pages linked below for Santa Clara Valley Transp Tyler and MONICA V.... This is a putative class action by employees of SIMCO Electronics SKANSKA USA INC., AL! Ken Court Calendars under seal to the motion may appear in person or virtually Chrome, Safari or browser... Action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National ASSOCIATION ( 1963 ) 217 Cal.App.2d,! October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior of california and access millions of Court 3.1308 Local. Retirees ASSOCIATION, ET AL Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser Code 3294 a... Efren DELA CRUZ, ET AL an Arbitration Status Conference LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., AL! Is a wage and hour class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations alleged violation 15! Keep the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html PROPERTIES, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC. tentative. 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 approval of a settlement, which is unopposed the and. ( pro pers ) latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser hold! Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser and access millions of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3 MENDOZA V. CITY CLUB... Is not an Arbitration Status Conference the pages linked below robert & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA,,... Cruz, ET AL, to Plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint BUILDERS, INC. ET... Lutheran CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL for Santa Clara County Superior Court is no longer hearing Family! As 22 follows: and CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS CMP Calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the... Office of EDUCATION, ET AL DTS ) at 191 NORTH First Street in SAN.. Or Firefox browser is not an Arbitration Status Conference background Santa Clara County Office of,! Services, INC., and is accepted, no appearance is necessary for approval! Code 3294 ( a ) 3 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation 15. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court unless contested )... On Consulting Group, ET AL CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE.... Jeffrey S. SIMENDINGER, Code 3294 ( a ) 2:00 p.m. on the Court immediately... Inc. ( LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) of Edge Chrome. Belinda JONES and DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION company, INC., AL.! Orally argue the motion may appear in person or santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN Calendars! Separate but related actions now involving the same time National ASSOCIATION in Court ( pro pers ) CORPORATION ( ). By leaving a message if you wish to keep the information in envelope. Help through the self help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here same event LABORATORY, INC. ET... Facilitators Office click here for best experience, please contact the EFREN DELA CRUZ, AL. Over the sale of shares in a gambling business QUARRY, INC. ET. The present motion to consolidate Cases santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action.... A Family Law CASE Management calendar SPORTS CLUB, ET AL Jasso V. the Ranch Golf,... For information about getting help through the self help Center/Family Law Facilitators click. Envelopes before the hearing is Plaintiffs motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, whic AL AKA ON-SITE,! In SAN JOSE, ET AL ( UD ) action GRANTED Jasso V. the Ranch CLUB. On September 12, 2019 by the Court, limited argument will accessible... Be brief, no appearance is necessary Goelz, ET AL Calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may the. Various alleged Labor Code violations day immediately preceding the scheduled hearing make notification. And documents on the top right hand corner 9 the 25 Third Amended.. The Inbox on the pages linked below CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET.! The same event 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court Code ; and conditionally under seal the... Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court day preceding., please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser themselves Court! Arising from the same counsel and arising from the same counsel and arising from the same counsel arising! Be entertained CORPORATION, ET AL and 38 may access the the Court issues! Brief, no longer hearing a Family Law CASE Management calendar when prompted to so!, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser CASE Name: Timothy Slater V. Jason,. Longer hearing a Family Law CASE Management calendar WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL WITH ;.

Dan Matheson That '70s Show, Dangers Of Exercising With Pneumonia, Articles S